On Juneteenth and Uncritical Race Theory

Steve Russell
5 min readJun 21, 2021
Graphic from Pixabay

It was December 18, 1865, when the 13th Amendment — which banned most slavery in all of the nation became part of the U.S. Constitution.

Lincoln, the film, was realistic enough to show that a lot of what was done to get it passed was not pretty. Ratification was even worse. The ratification of the 13th Amendment, the 14th Amendment (promising equal protection of the law), and the 15th Amendment (guaranteeing the right to vote) or legislation of equal import was made to be a condition of readmission to the Union.

This demand was extra-constitutional and, from the time Chief Justice Marshall arrogated the power to strike down acts of Congress in Marbury v. Madison, extra-constitutional had been synonymous in the minds of many people with unconstitutional. Bruce Ackerman claims that recasting of our constitutional understandings dehors the process in Article Five was not merely some usurpation but what he termed a “constitutional moment” that nobody contemplated at the drafting but had been accepted by all stakeholders or all those with any power.

“Constitutional moment” is a theory put forward by Ackerman and which he professed at the Yale Law School directed to explaining cases that might — without some method of explanation — leave a…

--

--

Steve Russell
Steve Russell

Written by Steve Russell

Enrolled Cherokee, 9th grade dropout, retired judge, associate professor emeritus, and (so far) cancer survivor. Memoir: Lighting the Fire (Miniver Press 2020)

Responses (2)